His spare, widescreen compositions conjure a slow-mounting sense of dread that's more Carpenter than Romero, while his set pieces, particularly the nursery sequence, are terrifyingly taut. Turns out the child of former Disney CEO Michael Eisner is a more than proficient horror filmmaker. It was a clever gimmick, and the only real reason to revisit "13 Ghosts" today, because, as a whole, the film isn't particularly scary, well-acted, or well-crafted. The third CD, Death Note Original Soundtrack III was released on June 27, 2007. Willard is one part Norman Bates and one part the Joker, his fury and mommy issues combined into something that's ultimately deadly. Romero's notion of regular, seemingly reasonable Americans becoming suddenly unhinged has loads of potential, but budgetary constraints, slack pacing, and poor performances undermine his film at every turn. Maybe it was just too good! The result is one of the very best horror remakes, an emotional, tragic, scary, and stomach-churning classic marked by incredible visual effects and a star-making performance from Jeff Goldblum as Seth Brundle, the ambitious scientist whose experiments with teleportation go terribly wrong. Horror has long thrived on sequels, remakes, and reboots, which can be made cheaply and quickly. The carefully unpacked story of bizarre tragedy, a mother's desperation, and one very, very malevolent little girl moves relentlessly toward a nerve-shredding climaxor what wethinkis the climax. Neither film is bad, but the 2021 rendition is much more faithful to the source material and greatly benefits from the strides in special effects and cinematic boundary-pushing that have transpired since the 1947 original. The 2010 Uruguayan filmLa Casa Muda(The Silent House) is quite an achievement, all things considered. Then again, there's only so much one can do with a murderous mass of jelly. It could be argued that 2017's It isn't so much a remake as another adaptation of Stephen King's classic 1987 novel. It tries to add almost everything the original had that made it so effective, but it does so without as much heart or care so it all comes together as something not as successful. Some fans objected to the alterations that directors Kevin Kolsch and Dennis Widmyer made in their new version, but by realising that slavishly copying an already decent first adaptation of the story would be pointless, they deliver an impressively scary movie that stands on its own, The production design, atmosphere, and performances are all much stronger in this version too. . Even so, that takes nothing away from what this film was able to accomplish, ranking as not just a better remake, but one of the greatest Stephen King adaptations ever made. Sean S. Cunningham might be a savvy producer, but he's an absolute clod when calling the shots behind the camera, and "Friday the 13th" is easily one of his worst directing efforts. Answer (1 of 15): When it comes to remakes, it is a mixed bag as to whether the original or the remake is better. That coupled with the outstanding performances by Anthony Perkins and the rest of the cast makes for an all-time classic. Alfred Hitchcock's prolific direction stood out in many of his works, but it showed inPsycho as one of his best. But the strong performances--most notably a terrifying Garret Dillahunt as the gang leader Krug--and gripping storytelling make it an overall superior movie. The film was shot for all of $6,000, so the fact that it made the festival circuit before getting a limited release is impressive enough. (Jeremy Smith). The remake features big-name. Both films utilize the human fear and fascination with an unknown "other," but the 1951 adaptation has most of the characters more or less united against the titular Thing, while the presence of the Thing turns the men against each other in the 1982 version. The original Psycho has many different sequels and iterations, including the somewhat recent television series Bates Motel. There have been many adaptations of Dracula, and it's hard to describe most of them as "remakes." With the original "It" miniseries, we got a great performance from Tim Curry as Pennywise, but ultimately, a compromised version of the sprawling horror epic that King crafted in 1986. Some have recently been released and other ones are currently under development. Unfortunately, what went up has come back down, and now it's feasting on the colorful inhabitants of idyllic Arborville, California. It is likely because this movie did it so well on just about every level that later remakes, such as 2007's "The Invasion," have had such a hard time finding the same level of success. (Danielle Ryan). If done correctly, as with John Carpenter's "The Thing," they become the stuff of legends; Iconic additions to the horror cannon that will truly stand the test of time. The Blob (1958): Directed by Irvin Yeaworth, the original is probably best remembered as the first starring role of a 28-year-old Steve McQueen. The original Maniac is an effectively grimy slice of early '80s grindhouse cinema, with the late Joe Spinell as Frank, a psychotic killer who uses the scalps of his female victims to decorate the mannequins in his apartment. (Danielle Ryan). The Thing. (Deshawn Thomas). Ad . This is precisely why Steve Beck's 2001 remake "Thir13en Ghosts" is a far superior film. Of course,The Ring has become a classic, andRingu is a very good film with several genuinely creepy momentsand also a film which, unfortunately, suffers from the stilted and theatrical acting style typical of Japanese releases of the time. The horror genre wouldn't be the same without Sam Raimi's 1981 classicThe Evil Dead. All things being fair, the 2005 "House of Wax" actually bears more similarities with the 1979 movie "Tourist Trap" than it does the film it's intending to remake. The 2020 remake ends with revenge, while the original does not contain any sort of meaningful or satisfying catharsis. By accepting all cookies, you agree to our use of cookies to deliver and maintain our services and site, improve the quality of Reddit, personalize Reddit content and advertising, and measure the effectiveness of advertising. Maybe the remake can add something to the original story, from a new character to an extra creepy setting to a creative filmmaking style. For proof, just queue up these horror remakes that actually turned out better than the original films. Maybe you'll love the selection we came up with! Privacy Policy. They were very, very wrong of course, and it is now rightly considered one of the best horror movies of the decade. The 2013 film is tense, well-acted, and efficiently paced, with jaw-dropping practical special effects of the type Hollywood hadn't seen in yearsa ridiculously underrated film, and a marked improvement on the influential but understandably flawed original. This means the main character is almost never onscreen (except, for example, when he sees himself in mirrors), and there's no cutting awayor evenlooking awaywhen Frank springs into murderous action, scalping his screaming victims as the camera looks dispassionately on. It's edited to appear as if it's one continuous, 88-minute shot, detailing the frightening goings-on after a young woman and her father show up to help renovate a creepy old house. I personally think the 2003 Texas Chainsaw Massacre has been the best remake Ive seen so far. Actually Good Movies Where the Monster is Fake Underrated Movies About Bugs Great Villains Stuck In Underwhelming Movies Original Vampire . This comparison need not detract from the viewing experience of the source material but instead can remind us to revisit and reappreciate those older horror films. Buckle up and get ready, this one's a little spicy! "Rebooting" -- that is, taking a franchise back to its origins and beginning again with a different take and cast -- is Hollywood's latest fad. The Ring is an improvement in every way over the original, anddespite its PG-13 ratingis one of the scariest films of all time. Most American remakes of Southeast Asian horror just aren't very good, but Gore Verbinski's "The Ring" is one of the very few that takes its source material and expands upon it. Released in 2006, the film garnered middling reviews despite being every bit as stylish and effective asHigh Tension(while ratcheting the gore way, way up). They toy with the iconography in surprisingly cheeky ways while turning Jason Voorhees into a more hulking, brute-force predator than he was in the previous movies. Luckily, Andy Muschietti's film is superior in almost every way. Sci-Fi Remakes That Are Better Than The Original That doesn't mean that remaking a classic is never a good idea. George A. Romero's 1973 horror flick about a town plunged into chaos when a military bio-weapon is accidentally unleashed on its populace isn't a zombie film per se. It is impossible to overstate the legacy of the original 1920 The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari on not only the cinematic landscape of horror but on film in general. The 2020 remake of "The Invisible Man" is dissimilar to the 1933 original in every way aside from the fact that there's an invisible man, and he's a horrible person. It's hard to beat a cast quite . It's a "classic" that begs for a modern critical reappraisal so it can be properly identified as one of the worst films ever madethat Craven made an actual classic,A Nightmare on Elm Street, only seven years later is utterly stupefying. Thanks to Oz's background working with the Jim Henson Company, he was able to wrangle some of the best puppeteers in the business, and Lyle Conway of "The Muppets Show," "Dark Crystal," and "The Great Muppet Caper" delivered puppet impeccability with Audrey II. But we all seem to forget that remakes and reboots have been around for as long as Hollywood, and sometimes, a good yarn needs more than one attempt to get it just right. Most horror films from the 1950s don't age well. Perhaps the world simply wasn't ready for Carpenter's masterpiece, which took the bones of the original's plota stranded group of researchers in Antarctica face off against a deadly alien beingand turned it into a master class in relentlessly escalating tension, coupled with some of the most insane, stomach-turning gore and makeup effects that have ever been put to film. It plays about as silly as it sounds, but for the 1986 remake, director David Cronenberg took the same premise to a truly horrifying, totally logical conclusion. Watch also for a pre-Breaking Bad Aaron Paul as one of the gang members. The film features a visual flair that's hard to top, with some truly inventive ways of stretching the budget to make everything feel even more grandiose and extravagant. Shelley White 10/3/2022. Their Blob is also a biological weapon created by the U.S. military, which they launched into space when it proved lethal to all of humanity. It's an eerie gem, less comedic than many of Price's subsequent films, and early proof that sometimes horror remakes get it right. We Are What We Are might not exactly scare your pants off, but it will stick with you long after viewing, and it's superior to its source material in pretty much every regard. The jump scares are also highly effective, and a late-film twist involving the heroine ditches melodrama (and local legend; the original film was questionably "based on true events") for something altogether more disturbing. There are two remakes of the 1933 movie Mystery of the Wax Museum, but while 2005's House of Wax is forgettable nonsense, the 1953 remake is a stone-cold classic. RELATED: All 4 Night Of The Living Dead Remakes Ranked Worst to Best. Molly Pennington, Stacker Oct 24, 2022 Oct 24, 2022 . The film died at the box office and was savaged by critics, who found the dark, serious tone and wild, disturbing makeup effects utterly repellent. For one thing no pun intended Carpenter's "The Thing" includes the alien creature's ability to shapeshift, while the 1951 version does not. The debate around this oddly unique pair of films will likely never be settled, and they're both excellent and diabolical pieces of workbut the 2007 version is ever-so-slightly better. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. For me the remake of the movie IT was a more enjoyable watch . Coppola's film breathes life into the text, making many of its most memorable moments into something even more stunning. Today's Wordle Answer (412) Warzone Patch Notes Madden 23 Patch Notes Rust Force Wipes Schedule PS Plus August Games . Tim Curry was amazing in the 90s, but I didn't enjoy the original IT the way I did while watching the 2017 version ! Aside from that, he enjoys the outdoors and games of any kind. David Cronenberg is responsible for more than his fair share of genre classics including "Scanners" and "Videodrome," but the filmmaker arguably gave us his crowning achievement in 1986 with his remake of "The Fly." Rob Bottin's bizarre special effects setpieces, featuring such famously insane sights as a severed head sprouting spider legs and an open chest cavity becoming a giant, gnashing mouth, are still considered among the greatest ever 35 years after the fact. There are few movies that could be classified as "perfect films," but 1986's "Little Shop of Horrors" is absolutely one of them. Of all its innovations, one of the most effective and influential is the purposeful absence of right angles in the set. But by a slight margin, it's the superior film, for one reason: Haneke intended for his original to be most challenging to the sensibilities of American audiences specifically, and his disappointment in its failure to make a splash in the U.S.directly led to the English-language remake. In addition, the decision to separate the kids' narrative from the one featuring them as adults (rather than jump between them as in the novel and the miniseries) is a smart one, allowing us to fully focus on their story. In fact, this is really the only time outside of "The Final Chapter" that Jason has been truly scary, which is no mean feat given that the character had been overtly parodied in his own movies (most notably "Friday the 13th Part VIII: Jason Goes to Vancouver, er, Manhattan, yes, that's totally Manhattan and not Vancouver"). This and the admirable performances lead to a tense and frightening final act on par with Carpenter's other endings. Director Chuck Russell and writer Frank Darabont's update of the 1958 creature feature made the most of then cutting-edge visual effects, with the titular alien mass now a terrifying, pulsating, creeping mass, rather than a big blob of wobbling jello. It feels as hollow as the titular ritualistic idol. Horror thrives on sequels, prequels, reboots, and remakes--it's not unusual for a popular . About Press Copyright Contact us Creators Advertise Developers Terms Privacy Policy & Safety How YouTube works Test new features Press Copyright Contact us Creators . The English-language 2013 version borrows the basic premise of the original, but little else. Goldblum's performance certainly goes a long way to help elevate this film, but Geena Davis, who plays Brundle's girlfriend Veronica, also deserves a tremendous deal of credit as she has to follow him down this horrifying rabbit hole. The film was written by Chad and Carey W. Hayes, the twin brothers who would go on to write "The Conjuring." Many children of the '80s will remember the ominous cover artfrom the shelves of their local video stores, which is the only place the film ever gained much of an audienceit was a box office failure, because it simply wasn't very good. Muschietti also did the terrors of "It" justice, aided greatly by a stellar performance from Bill Skarsgrd as Pennywise the Clown. Stephen King adaptations keep on coming, and not only are his more recent novels getting adapted, classics that have already been made once before are also getting the remake treatment. The TV maverick behind American Horror Story produced this new version of the cult '70s slasher The Town That Dreaded Sundown with prolific horror producer Jason Blum, and delivered a movie that works as both a remake and an ingenious meta-sequel. The bees are great, and all, but a classic they are not! The idea was ported over from 1998's Japanese horror hitRingu, and sureon its surface, the premise sounded ridiculous, unless you were one of the lucky viewers who happened to catch the "killer video" on late-night TV, where it aired several times in advance of the film's release with no explanation. Dan Auty No shade to the Roger Corman-produced original, but bringing a low-budget B-movie to a fight against a remake featuring music from Disney renaissance legends Alan Menken and Howard Ashman and directed by Miss Piggy and Yoda himself, Frank Oz, is asking for a butt-kickin'. Russell's direction is unfussy and efficient; he zips through the pseudo-scientific exposition and keeps the viewer on their toes by killing off some of the film's most likable characters early on. So it might seem surprising that he'd take on the remake of a schlocky '50s B-movie about a man who accidentally turns into a fly. There's no denying that Wes Craven's groundbreaking Last House on the Left remains a powerful and disturbing experience. John Carpenter's "The Thing" was a remake of the 1951 film "The Thing From Another World", and Carpenter's 1982 version is the superior version of that story. (Ryan Scott). Raimi's original invigorated the genre, but its ultra-low budget aesthetic is so glaring that when given a chance to make a much higher-budgeted sequel, the director chose to basically make the same film again. While this may seem scarier, it loses the heart and innovation of the original for the sake of looking flashier. The story of a cursed videotape that kills you when you watch it might have sounded silly to American audiences beforeGore Verbinski'sThe Ringwas released in 2002.
Activebuilding Customer Service Number,
Antique Bronze Fireplace Tools,
Bridgewater Book Series,
Svs Pb16-ultra Subwoofer,
Public Swimming Pool Florence,
Winter Rv Camping In North Carolina,
Kalahari First Responder Discount,
Wacom Art Pen Vs Grip Pen,